Explain how Sartre might defend existentialism against the claim that it leaves a moral vacuum.

1 answer:

4 0

Answer: The claim that existentialism leaves a moral vacuum is a common one against this philosophy, and one that Sartre was aware of. Existentialism places freedom at the centre of human experience, and this includes the freedom from traditional moral views, which at first glance, could be worrisome for some people.

However, getting rid of moral traditions imposed by society is a choice: the choice to define your own morality. And by defining this morality, you replace old values with new ones. Therefore, there is no vacuum as there is no "empty space." When some social rules are removed from our ethical code, some other personal rules replace them. Sartre places great value on "authenticity." This is the creation of our own self in freedom. Through authenticity and freedom, we design ourselves, both as individuals and in society. Existentialism, therefore, does not imply the loss of ethics (and therefore, the lack of morals), but only the creation of a new ethics based on individual freedom and authenticity.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Antonym for eliminate?

Alex777 [14]

Answer:

antonyms are word that are opposite in meaning not same in meaning.

the word eliminate means to get rid of something.

so therefore two antonym for eliminate is get and accept.

3 0

3 years ago

Hey um can u help me with this due 2 day :)) follow me on R0BL0X my user is cashslur

Dovator [93]

Answer:

i cont follow you rn but my username is Omegalegoblock3000 :)

Explanation:

btw your pic is really blurry

3 0

3 years ago

Read the excerpt from Carlito’s letter to the editor.

adelina 88 [10]

The evidence the author uses to support the false analogy is that college sports are just as important as bookstores.

We can arrive at this answer because:

The author uses a false relationship between university games and university bookstores.
He uses this to show that students who work in bookstores receive salaries, but university players don't, but they are of equal importance.
The evidence that the author shows to confirm this relationship is that college games are as important as bookstores.
However, both the relationship and the evidence convey an incorrect idea.

Bookstores are part of the educational system that universities should promote, university games are not. In addition, many college athletes have scholarships, while students working in the campus do so for salaries or lower funding.

You can find more information about false analogy at the link:

brainly.com/question/1235960

8 0

3 years ago

For the field trip, our teacher told us to bring our permission slips, a sack lunch, and some money for souvenirs.

loris [4]

Order of importance.....

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When does the main action of the story take place? to kill a mockingbird

Semmy [17]