It would violate the constitution i believe. The President shouldn't have that much power. Our government was designed to have that many branches to make sure things went slow, so we could protest any new rules. If the president managed to fire the Supreme Court, a crucible part of our government would be gone!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
Answer:
435 members and last one at the bottom
Explanation:
Written Law. Draco wrote his written law which was critiqued for it's harshness.
Answer:
People quickly figure out what they are best at producing, given the specific resources that they own, and then they make those items.
Explanation:
It is necessary for the group to quickly decide which items are needed for the activities it has in mind. Right after that it is necessary to evaluate the resources that are available to manufacture these items. Once these factors are decided, it is necessary for each team member to recognize their abilities and quickly discover what they can do, thus forming subgroups that will make the production of items faster, in addition to optimizing the use of resources.
