Polls are always accurate and not-biased.
Answer:
Because of the treaty they made.
Explanation:
Answer:
The White House
Explanation:
When the British reached Washington D.C. near the end of the War of 1812, they set the White House, Capitol, and many other public buildings on fire.
If you're trying to fill in the blanks, then the answers are already there. They are at the end of the each line.
Deists like <u>Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin</u> endorsed the concept of supreme being...
All the following are true of the Second Great Awakening except that it was <u>not as large as the first Great Awakening.</u>
As a revivalist preacher, <u>Charles Grandison Finney</u> advocated opposition to slavery...
... Baptists William Miller is least related to <u>Brigham Young, Book of Mormon, Salt Lake City, polygamy</u>
...angered many non-Mormons was their emphasis on <u> cooperative or group effort</u>
Tax supported public education was deemed essential for <u>social stability and democracy.</u>
...New England reformer <u>Dorothea Dix</u>...
...stemmed from the hard and <u>monotonous life of many</u>
...from the wave of <u>nationalism</u> that followed...
Hope this helps!!!
Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
