Answer:nevergonnagiveyouup
Explanation:1=(2+4)12
Because it kills innocent animals just for their furs, husks, horns, etc. It also endangers the animals. Hope this helps!
Out of the choices given, attacking the person instead of the argument is a type of logical fallacy called ad hominem. The correct answer is C, ad hominem.
Answer:
Rainsford won the wager. He fought Rainsford in the bedroom and Zaroff got fed to his own dogs. I suppose when Rainsford is in a tree and reflects that this is how an animal must feel to be hunted tips us off that he has a new attitude. The story, however, is so bizarre that the theme isn't dealt with in any depth. Perhaps Rainsford might think a little more about hunting defenseless animals in the future but I doubt he would start an animal rights movement.
<h3>
<em><u>Hope it will help you</u></em></h3>
Answer:
The film isn't as good as the book
Explanation:
