<span>Ricardo can most likely recover the cost of his injury from oxley in a suit based on the tort theory of outrage. This theory is also called the
Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). It is a common law tort which allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual that intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an extreme and outrageous way.</span>
Answer:
This is because a change in autonomous expenditure changes income and sets off further changes in induced expenditure.
Answer:
A)The court found that the defendant had established a prima facie defense of duress and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Explanation:
The court ruled in favor of Charlotte Russe because the amendment of the contract was done under duress. Duress occurs when a party (generally with superior bargaining power) threats to file a lawsuit, physically hurt, or in this case cut a service provided if the other party does not agree to the terms of the proposed contract.
E.g. I force my neighbor to sell me his Playstation because if he didn't I would beat him up.
The actual words of the court were:
<em>"[a] party may rescind a contract on the ground of duress if the party proves by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that [it] agreed to the contract because of an improper threat by the other party that left no reasonable alternative."</em>
Answer:
10.0775%
Explanation:
The formula to compute WACC is shown below:
= Weightage of debt × cost of debt × ( 1- tax rate) + (Weightage of preferred stock) × (cost of preferred stock) + (Weightage of common stock) × (cost of retained earning)
= 0.35 × 6.50% × (1 - 0.40) + (0.10 ×6%) + (0.55 × 14.75%)
= 1.365% + 0.6% + 8.1125%
= 10.0775%
Simply we multiply the weighatge with the capital structure cost
