Answer:
Explanation:
So unlimited a power can belong only to God matches with Some things are beyond the control of people and governments
I call not upon a few, but upon all. matches with All people need to do their part.
Show your faith by your works matches with Back your words with actions
Be too tough rather than not tough enough matches with better have too much force than too little
What we obtain too cheap, we esteem to lightly matches with What can be gotten easily is not always greatly appreciated
Let them call me rebel and welcome: I feel no concern from it. matches with One should proudly stand up for one's beliefs
Answer:
Aztec and the Norse afterlife had several of special heavenly places for the warriors who died in battles, while other warriors or individuals are sent to the cold and terrifying underworld, known as Niflheim or can be referred to as hell for short. Individuals who are placed in the heavenly places are the people who have done numerous of generous deeds and/or have suffered misfortunes in their lives.
Answer:Peace smells like flowers
Peace looks like colours
Peace looks like faces.”
Explanation:
brainliest plz
Answer:
Using Colin Powell's 2003 pre-war speech to the UN as a case study, this essay illustrates ways in which discourse analytic methods can serve investigations of constitutive rhetoric. Prior to the speech, Powell's reluctance to go to war and his skepticism of the need for military action in Iraq was well known. His conversion to the administration's position was key to the persuasiveness of the speech. Thus, within the speech he needed to reconstitute his ethos from doubter to advocate. The analysis focuses on how specific linguistic qualities such as modality, positioning, narrative, and evaluation assist Powell in doing so. These discourse analytic tools reveal ways in which discrete linguistic moves contribute to the constitutive work of ethos formation and re-formation.
Explanation:
Answer:
- Circular reasoning.
Explanation:
A Fallacy is described as a flaw or error in the reasoning of an argument which makes the argument unsound and invalid.
Circular reasoning is characterized as the logical fallacy in which the argument begins with the point through which the author wishes to end/conclude the argument.
The given argument exemplifies 'circular reasoning' as it assumes that 'the actors are conceited' which implies that the point author is trying to prove is already assumed true. <u>This creates a logical error as the conclusion is made without any proof</u>.
