Until now, given a function <span>f(x)</span>, you would plug a number or another variable in for x. You could even get fancy and plug in an entire expression for x. For example, given <span>f(x) = 2x + 3</span>, you could find <span>f(y2 – 1)</span> by plugging<span> y2 – 1</span> in for x to get <span>f(y2 – 1) = 2(y2 – 1) + 3 = 2y2 – 2 + 3 = 2y2 + 1</span>.
In function composition, you're plugging entire functions in for the x. In other words, you're always getting "fancy". But let's start simple. Instead of dealing with functions as formulas, let's deal with functions as sets of<span> (x, y)</span><span> points </span>
<span>Hope this awnsers your question</span>
<span>
</span>
<span />
Djfjffjjf fuffyrjtjfyffyfyf tutut ryryrur44r r rrytyt tyryrfugjy tyruffg r 7r7tr
this is the answer and where the parentheses -8+(3-2)+7=-16
Exponential would be the correct answer I believe...
