1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANTONII [103]
3 years ago
8

I'd like apologise for.........​

English
1 answer:
Zarrin [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: What's you apology I wanna hear it?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
To witch branch of government does the power to interpret laws and apply the constitution to the law belong
Mekhanik [1.2K]
The judicial branch
5 0
3 years ago
What about a modern performance of a Shakespearean play could be changed without affecting the play's meaning?
Amanda [17]

Answer:

We could change the language and adapt it to reflect the contemporary English we use nowadays. That would make the play more understandable, especially for the young people and wake up their interest for the theatre.  

We could change the setting, that is, time and place of some plays and adapt it to contemporary surroundings, without changing the topic of the plays, as Shakespearean problems and inner struggles are still present in the 21st century, only in different ways.

For example, we could change characters' professions or some circumstances without changing the plot of the story. Or, perhaps, try to represent some contemporary family issues, by readapting Hamlet into a boy who is fighting against his stepfather.

8 0
3 years ago
an absorbing interest in the proceedings. These lines from the story show that the other boys want to talk to the shop girl are
kykrilka [37]
That's a little confusing sorry
5 0
4 years ago
What is “nougat”? You’ve seen the ads on television. A voice entices you with words like “rich milk chocolate” and “fresh, crunc
Tomtit [17]
They arent a fan of nougat and want to show that despite how it sounds its actually bad for you
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Yolanda is 24, Zachary is 44, and Andrew is 73. Assume that each successfully completed the psychosocial crisis associated with
sashaice [31]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Erik Erikson's theory of Psychosocial Development was developed by Erik Erikson and Joan Erikson in the late twentieth century. The theory is divided into eight stages of development of a child till late adulthood. Each stage is divided into two parts that denote the outcome of successful completion or unsuccessfulness in that stage.

So, according to Erikson's theory, the successful completion of the people mentioned above will be Yolanda at the intimacy stage, Zachary at generativity, and Andrew at the wisdom stage.

Intimacy v. Isolation is the sixth stage of the theory. This stage comprises of people aged between 20-40 years. In this stage, adults begin to share themselves intimately with others in loving relationships. If one fails at this stage of development, he/she begin to develop isolation and fear of intimate relationships. But successful completion results in intimacy.

<u>Yolanda is 24 and at the sixth stage of the development. Thus, her successful completion will result in intimacy</u>.

Generativity v. Stagnation is the seventh stage of the theory. This stage consists of people aged between 40-65 years. At this stage, middle aged-adults begin to find the work in which they can contribute to the welfare of the next generation. They begin to contribute towards the welfare of the society which can leave the lasting impact. Successful completion of this stage results in generativity whereas failure leaves them with feelings of stagnation and that they are not able to work towards the contribution; thus leaving them with little connections and little room for self-improvement.

<u>Zachary, who is 44 years old, belongs to the middle aged-adults and the seventh stage of the theory. Thus, according to the theory, his successful completion will lead him to generativity</u>.

Integrity v. Despair is the eighth and last stage of the theory. People who are 65+ till death belongs to this stage. At this stage, old aged adults begin to look back at their life and reflect on whether they succeeded in doing what they wanted or failed. After knowing that they successfully lived their lives leads them to wisdom. This wisdom helps them to sense the completeness in their lives and they feel ready to face death without fear. Failure in living a good life makes them feel despair.

<u>Andrew is 73 years old and belongs to the eight stage of the theory. Thus, his successful completion of this stage will lead him to integrity and wisdom</u>.

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • “Kids today eat 25% less fresh fruit than kids in 2000.” Why is this not a strong topic idea?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the tone of the passage “Just Be Yourself!”?
    6·1 answer
  • What event brought Roger and Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones into contact? What was Mrs. Jones’s immediate reaction to this e
    12·2 answers
  • Questions of policy address issues of right and wrong.
    14·1 answer
  • According to Mrs. Putnam, what can't Betty bear to hear?
    11·1 answer
  • “Comrades!” he cried. “You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of
    13·2 answers
  • Can anyone help me with these questions:
    8·2 answers
  • How are cultural stereotypes of Native Americans in cartoons and movies harmful?
    10·1 answer
  • Find the units digit of the following within the indicated number base: $(14_8)^2$
    12·1 answer
  • My father is N G O officer .a/an/the ​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!