The correct answer is B. The colonists suffered persecution for their religious beliefs
Explanation:
The First Amendment adopted in 1791 stated the government could not make any laws to establish any religion, forbid the free exercise of it or limit the freedom of speech, press, and assembly. In the case of religion, this issue emerged as religious minorities were concerned about the dominance of only one church or religion in the states as this has led to persecution to religious minorities and after multiple court cases found difficulties in determining whether religion should be considered in relation to the job or the school context. This implies the First Amendment was added as many of the colonists belonged to religious minorities and suffered persecution for it and thus, wanted the state to guarantee their right to free exercise other religions different to the dominant one.
First, the idea will have to go trough the 3 branches of give. Alternative, it could go trough one branch but according to checks and balances the other branches will have to see if it is fallowing the rights. Then it must be accepted by the 3 branches and passed. Alternative, it could then it will be a law.
I think the correct answer among the choices listed above is option C. Farmers were the largest social class that made up Egypt or ancient Rome. At that time, there were more farmers and herders than anyone else in ancient Egypt and Rome. Hope this answers the question.
More women have been employed outside their homes, resulting in greater employment :)
<span>In a common law system, judges are obliged to make their rulings as consistent as reasonably possible with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. The Constitution accepted most of the English common law as the starting point for American law. Situations still arise that involve rules laid down in cases decided more than 200 years ago. Each case decided by a common law court becomes a precedent, or guideline, for subsequent decisions involving similar disputes. These decisions are not binding on the legislature, which can pass laws to overrule unpopular court decisions. Unless these laws are determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, they preempt the common law precedent cases. Judges deciding cases are bound by the new law, rather than the precedent cases.</span>
