The three lines that read “The angels, not half so happy in Heaven, Went envying her and me— Yes!—that was the reason (as all men know, In this kingdom by the sea) That the wind came out of the cloud by night, Chilling and killing my Annabel Lee.” contain <u>alliteration</u>. Alliteration is the repetition of the same sounds, usually initial consonants of words or of stressed syllables, in a sequence of neighbouring words. Within the three lines in the excerpt mentioned before, one can identify a sound repeated in a sequence of neighbouring words: “half”, “happy”, and “Heaven”.
Answer:
While converting Interrogative Active into Interrogative Passive Voice.
PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST !!!
Explanation:
Simple Present Tense
is, am, are + 3rd verb
She has not stolen my book. My book has not been stolen by her. (Negative)
Has she stolen my book? Has my book been stolen by her? (Interrogative)
Simple Past Tense
Answer:
A fugitive is someone who is running from the law to avoid being arrested or caught. They usually leave the state, city, sometimes even country they were cheated in to avoid the consequences.
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
Answer:
No, is not. Woke is a term that emerged in the 1990s to describe a militant and combative mindset for the protection of minorities and against racism. Today, a woke person is defined as someone who is aware of all injustices and all forms of inequality and oppression that weigh on minorities, of racism to sexism, including environmental concerns, and which generally uses an intersectional vocabulary. Therefore, Wokeism is a process that has been going on for 30 years, through which the population has begun to understand the social problems of America, and to seek solutions to them through proposals of equality and solidarity.
