Answer:
I find Andrew Jackson not guilty of all three charges. He committed no crimes against the indians; rather, he was working to keep them safe from the crimes the white settlers committed against them. ... The prosecution argued that Jackson influenced the removal of the indians, and that they had no say in their removal.
Explanation:
Afghanistan being in a very strategic position has provided the Soviet the advantage of controlling trades as it is in the juncture between Asia and middle east. This gave better leverage to the Soviet compared to the united states having control of pakistan after WorldWar 2. The soviet influenced has not been good in terms of improving afghan either as it made several internal tribal sect enemies with each other due to oppression and poor economy impacting poorest of the poor families.
Answer: The most obvious example for this is from the battle of the bulge, where hitler tried to turn the tide agansit the american forces by reapeting the strategy he did against the french 5 years ago. Trying to punch a hole through the enemy lines and use tanks to mop up the infantry. This worked to some degree, with an american force being trapped in a town during the battle.
He lost a decisive battle to Ghana.
ptive) -
The economy operates according to the law of supply and demand for goods and services. According to this theory, the interaction between supply and demand for a good or service fits and the vector of adjustment is price.
If the price is high, there is more supply than demand. If the price is low, there is more demand than supply. If demand increases, price increases and supply increases. If demand falls, the price falls. That is, the price makes the interaction. There will be a moment where the quantity offered is exactly equal to the quantity demanded, at which point the price practiced is the equilibrium price.
So if an economy is in equilibrium at a time and then the price charged is higher than the equilibrium price, it means that demand has gotten higher than supply.
<u>However, none of the alternatives would explain why a price is charged above the equilibrium price.</u> <u>The answer is the reverse of what is written in alternative (A)</u>. The truth is this: As the quantity demanded rises, the price rises above the equilibrium price. <u>This is the answer</u>.
The alternative (B) is true, although it does not answer the question of the problem. If prices rise, demand falls. This is because the high price discourages consumption.
BTW, I'm an economist and I'm sure.
