I would say the answer is D
Answer:
Exxon's response worsened its public standing.
Explanation:
Crisis management is the application of game plan to help an organization deal with a sudden and significant negative event.
The Exxon's response is a perfect example of how company should apply thoughtful response in crisis management because Exxon corporation failed to follow several well-established procedures thereby damaged its public standing, failed to seize control of developments after the spill and sending lower-ranking executive to address the situation instead of the chairman going there himself to take control of the situation in a possible way.
The action taken by Exxon led to the impression that the company disregard pollution problem by not involving top management.
Answer:
<em>c. Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
</em>
Explanation:
The warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is inferred whenever a purchaser depends on the supplier to pick the products to fit a particular query.
For instance, if a customer asks a mechanic to supply winter tires and receives tires that are unfit for use in weather, this warranty is breached.
It is also possible to explicitly revoke this implicit warranty by name, thus moving the threat of unfitness back to the purchaser.
Answer:
D) 1,200 shares held at a cost basis of $37.50 per share
Explanation:
Since the company paid a stock dividend, it increased the number of stocks held by the stockholders. The investor initially had 1,000 shares plus a 20% dividend = 1,000 x 1.2 = 1,200 shares. Since each stock should theoretically be worth less, his/her basis should decrease. The basis for each stock was $44(price) + $1(commission) = $45, after the dividend is paid it will be adjusted to $45 / 1.2 = $37.50 per stock
<span>Circumstances that help Walmart succeed usually makes it difficult for little businesses to thrive. The absence of government regulation generally profits big businesses and is unfavorable to small businesses. This leads to the emergence of monopolies and the abolishment of little businesses, even if they are original and innovative. In theory; more government regulation (if fair and just) would help small businesses compete more fairly with big business.</span>
