Answer:
Title: The Meet
Author: n/a (was not included in your question package)
Protagonist: Ariel
Antagonist: Maria
Conflict: Maria loses her lucky pink swim cap / Ariel wants to beat her rival in a swim race.
Rising action: Ariel sees herself content and the winner of the race.
Climax: Maria loses her cap.
Falling action: Ariel has to decide whether or not to give Maria her cap or stay quiet.
Resolution: Ariel sees herself a winner, but not so content with winning. She gives Maria her lost lucky pink cap and continues to the race.
Theme: You truly only win when everybody wins.
Theme restated: Don't win to lose, win to make it count.
<h3 /><h3>I've completed your graphic organizer, but I can't do much after that because I do not have a reference to your sample summary.</h3>
The character of Chaucer serves as our guide to the action. Sometimes Chaucer narrates like he's really there in the tavern, just meeting these pilgrims for the first time, and we feel like we're right there with him. At other times, though, Chaucer is a narrator who seems to know way<span> more than he should. For example, he tells us that, when the Shipman wins a fight, he murders the loser by throwing him overboard, or that the Reeve is stealing from his master. Now is that really something these people would tell Chaucer on first meeting him? And how does Chaucer know so </span>many<span> details of the pilgrims' day-to-day lives? At these moments, Chaucer acts much more like an omniscient, or all-knowing, narrator, than one who's </span>truly<span> in the heat of the action. The reason for this choice could be that verisimilitude, or making things seem like real life, was not as important to a medieval author as it is to authors today. Instead, the narrator might choose to tell whatever he wants to tell to serve the purposes of characterization.</span>
Answer:
what are you struggling with ? we want to help you.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think pls mark me brainiest :D
Explanation:
