There's nothing wrong with this pronoun agreement because nothing needs to be changed. It's a trick question.
Answer:
There are two different ways that interpretation should be possible. One is in exactly the same words. Two is setting.
Explanation:
There are two different ways that interpretation should be possible. One is in exactly the same words. Two is setting. At the point when you translate utilizing in exactly the same words you will in general pass up a major opportunity the entire importance of the content. There are occurrences that equivalents of the word is utilized to make it more comprenhensible. At the point when you interpret it dependent on the context it is composed, you may pass up significant words that were utilized to put accentuation on the idea being handed-off. While making an interpretation of old content into current day phrasing. The centrality of the words may decrease because as time passes by a great deal of words are made to mean something very similar. Not at all like in the old content a solitary word is just restricted to a solitary importance
Answer:
endless (often used hyperbolically).
Explanation:
Answer:
Think of responsibilities she may have when taking care of you.
Explanation:
Think simple things your mom may do every day that not everyone has the ability to do. Here are a few ideas to think about:
Is she a good cook? does she cook for you often?
Is she smart and friendly when you or others are around?
Will she go out of her way to help you or others?
What kind of talents does she have that other people might not?
Is she supportive of you?
Does she set an example of any other things you may want to be when you get older?
