But sharecroppers were still poor, and it was hard for them to save money to buy their own land. White land-owners liked that, because they didn't want black people to own their own land.
Many white farmers also became sharecroppers after the Civil War. In Mississippi, for instance, about a third of the white farmers were sharecroppers, and more than three-quarters of the black farmers were sharecroppers. Nearly all of the land-owners, though, were white. The white land-owners arranged things so that most sharecroppers could not make enough money sharecropping to buy their food and clothes. They ended up having to borrow money from the land-owners, and soon they were always in debt. The land-owners said they could not leave the land if they owed money, so in many places share-cropping ended up being a lot like slavery.
Link for more information: quartr.us
It's an awesome study guide I highly suggest it .
The correct answer to this question is c
Answer:
I support this idea.
Explanation:
Arguments in favor:
- -After WWII, U.S. obtained a role as a global leader and abandons isolationism.
- It adopted policy to halt the expansion of communist influence that was developed and framed by George Kennan, a US diplomat serving in Moscow.
- involvement in Korea and Vietnam grew out of commitments and assumptions of containment; the US got involved to stop the spread of communism.
- -Containment was the U.S. doctrine of the Cold War, the primary U.S. foreign policy from Truman Doctrine (1947) to fall of Berlin Wall (1989).
Congress was near bankruptcy in 1780 because they didn't have the power to tax the people.
The European nations, the United States, and Japan all wanted to make money there, but the United States had a problem.