Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
The advertising spend would reduce income taxes by $2.8 million
Explanation:
The advertising expense since it is allowable expense from profits made in the year would reduce income taxes next year by $2.8 million ($8 million *35%)
This means that because of its tax deductibility,it would make a business sense to incur the advertising cost of $8 million coupled with the fact the it has the potential to increase sales revenue over and above the current level of $280 million
Answer:
Walker's did not outperform because it PE Ratio is close to Industry average. Industry's data is based on average which means some of the firms may have very high PE ratio and some might have quite lower than the average. It is not obvious that the Walker's outperformed or under-performed. Complete data about the individual firms might make us able to compare the performance of Walker's. Apparently its performance is up to the mark as its PE ratio is very close to Industry average.
Explanation:
<u>PE Ratio</u> is a term which show the investors confidence on the firm. It shows that how much price investors are willing to pay against each unit of earning.
Answer:
Lower bound is $3024
Upper bound is $3862
Mean(U) = $3443
Sample (n) = 100
Explanation:
9.63 According to USA TODAY research, the average personal debt (such as loans on cars, credit cards, and so forth) per household in the United States was $17,989 in 2004 (USA TODAY October 4, 2004). A recent random sample of 75 households from New Hampshire yielded a mean personal debt of $16,450 with a standard deviation of $4650. Using the 2% significance level, can you conclude that the current nean personal debt for all households in New Hampshire is different from $17,989? Use both the p-value approach and the critical-value approach.
Answer: 12 months
Explanation:
Let's assume I want to get a 2007 Volkswagen Jetta $12,000, which has a very good review. I'll need to save for 12months to get $6000 then add $6000 which would be given to me by my parents, at the end of 12months I would be able to get the 2007 Volkswagen Jetta which goes for $12,000.
