Answer:
- 41.67%
Explanation:
For computing the rate of return first we have to compute the initial investment which is shown below:
= Number of shares × per share × initial margin percentage
= 300 shares × $60 per share × 60%
= $10,800
Now Loss on sale of common stock is
= (Selling price - purchase price) × number of shares purchased
= ($45 - $60 ) × 300 shares
= - $4,500
So the rate of return will be:
= Loss ÷ Initial Investment
= - $4,500 ÷ $10,800
= - 41.67%
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
The economy would be in equilibrium as AE = 1000 + 0.9Y
Y = 1000 + 0.9Y
Y - 0.9Y = 1000
(1-0.9) Y = 1000
Y = 1000/0.1
Y = $10000
AE = 10,000
<h3>What does total spending actually mean?</h3>
Aggregate expenditure, a macroeconomic statistic, is used to measure and evaluate the total amount of economic activity or output within a country. A nation's total outlays over a given time period are measured by aggregate expenditure, just as the gross domestic product (GDP) and national income.
Expenditures that alter in reaction to real GDP are referred to as induced aggregate expenditures. Take consumption spending as an example of an induced aggregate expenditure, which rises with real GDP.
For more information about aggregate expenditure refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13525490
#SPJ4
