Answer:
C. a question that can be answered completely through simple research
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
<u>(D) In casual conversation, people most readily admit to having a character flaw only when that admission causes them little psychological discomfort</u>.
Explanation:
An assumtion necessary to the argument is that is is possible that a person admit in front of another it's own flaws, when of course that flaw doesn't cause much discomfort in the person admiting it.
Answer:
Im sure the answer is will be
hope this helps.
Hi!
The correct options would be Direct Quotations and Paraphrasing.
Textual evidence refers to those lines or statements that substantiate a claim. In our case, while analyzing a literary piece, we can incorporate direct quotations, or paraphrase particular lines from the essay that support our argument or opinion.
Direct quotations are lines cited unaltered directly from the essay, and are incorporated between quotation marks. This is the most effective form of textual evidence.
Paraphrasing entails that the same idea, fact or message conveyed by the author in the essay are mentioned in the analysis in one's own words.
The thesis statement is clearly defines the topic of the analysis and all the textual evidence must be presented in a way to support it. It, itself, cannot be textual evidence.
The summary of the plot would be the brief account of the essay, and may not necessarily be as effective in proving a claim, and does not qualify as effective textual evidence when analyzing a literary essay.
Similarly the biography of the author may or may not relate to the literary essay, and is hardly used as textual evidence.
Hope this helps.
