<span>o ask a still more obvious question, what is the purpose of this technological progress? What higher aim do we think it is serving? Surly the aim cannot be the integrity or happiness of our families, which we have made subordinate to the education system, the television industry, and the consumer economy. Surely it cannot be the integrity of health of out communities, which we esteem even less than we esteem our families. Surly it cannot be love of our country, for we are far more concerned about the desecration of the flag than we are about the desecration of our land. Surly it cannot be the love of God, which counts for at least as little in the daily order of business as the love of family, community, and country.</span>
Answer:
1) Felt out of place.
2) Stayed quiet
Explanation:
When someone gets placed in an unfamiliar situation with people they dont usually interact with - everyone has different responding methods based on their personality. I'm more introverted. Hence the above answer.
I believe the answer is: <span> enforcement powers
Non-legislative powers refers to the power that is not related to the process of making law.
Enforcement power is the power for congress to propose </span><span>amendment's provisions by appropriate legislation, which is related to the process of creating new law</span>
Scholars have found that having some cultural information and positive expectations may lead to more in-depth conversations than having no information.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The research was done by Manusv and Hegda in the matter about the information about the culture. In the research they found that, having some information about the culture allows the people to have a proper conversation about that place and the culture of that place.
If they have some information, this will allow them to talk about it and if they have no idea about the culture, there can be no conversation about that culture.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
