Lakoff argues that the differences in opinions between liberals and conservatives observe from the truth that they subscribe with one-of-a-kind energy to two special valuable metaphors about the relationship of the kingdom to its citizens. both, he claims, see governance via metaphors of the family.
Robin Tolmach Lakoff (/ˈleɪokayɒf/; born November 27, 1942) is a professor emeritus of linguistics at the college of California, Berkeley. Her 1975 e-book Language and woman's area is frequently credited for making language and gender a primary debate in linguistics and different disciplines.
Lakoff advised that those variations she noticed were part of 'girls' Language' and become preferred visible as not as good as men. The 'Deficit version' refers to how this language use contributes to women's lower status and weaker function in society.
Learn more about Lakoff here:
brainly.com/question/17751794
#SPJ9
Answer:
I think Africa for the first one
And the 2nd one is Mexico is 19.0000 degrees N and 102.3667 degrees
I hope this is right.
Answer:
Extinction
Explanation:
In terms of psychology, extinction refers to the progressive weakening of a conditioned response that results in a reduction or absence of the behavior. it explains why a prior conditioned behavior of an organism would eventually stop and it can be observed in both classical conditioning and operant conditioning. As per the question, the extinction signifies stopping of the saliva of the dog in absence of reinforcement of the behavior.
Mountains the tough incline created tough treks
The answer is <u>"adjudication".</u>
Criminal justice is a procedure, including a progression of steps starting with a criminal examination and completion with the arrival of an indicted wrongdoer from restorative supervision. Standards and basic leadership are at the focal point of this procedure.
Trial/adjudication of guilt by a judge or jury, with an examiner and a barrier lawyer taking an interest. A preliminary is held under the watchful eye of a judge or jury. The standard of proof for a criminal conviction is blame past a sensible uncertainty—under 100 percent sureness yet more than high likelihood. On the off chance that there is question in light of reason, the charged is qualified for be vindicated.