Good evening Brian,
For this problem, let's look at what we're given. So we have a pool with a length that is 13 m (meters) longer than its width, and we're given the perimeter, or distance around the entire pool, which is 74 m.
We know that the pool has a rectangular shape and that the perimeter of a rectangle is <span>width + length + width + length ⇒ 2(W) + 2(L)</span>.
Given the information provided, we can rewrite the equation to fit this problem. Since we're told that the length is equal to 13 m + the width, so we can represent the length as W +13 m. We can now rewrite the perimeter equation to be:
2(w) + 2 (w + 13 m) ⇒ 2(w) + 2(w) + 2(13 m) ⇒ 4(w) + 26 m = 74 m.
We're down to one variable now so this should be easy. Subtract 26 m from both sides,
4(w) = 48 m
Now divide each side by 4 in order to find the width.
w = 12 m
-Hope this helps!
Answer:
251.047804213 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
c1 t=3.5+1 speed 40 mph
c2 t=3.5 speed 50 mph
c1 40 *4.5= 180
c2 50 *3.5= 175
a^2+ b^2= c^2
180^2+175^2=c^2
32400+30625=c^2
63025=c^2
251.047804213=c
Answer:
80 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
if 1 = 20 then 20 is width but ? is length
1=20
2=40
3=60
4=80
since 4 in is length then actual length is 80ft
Answer:
what
Step-by-step explanation:
- (4, 5) and (4, -2) -
We can find the slope by using rise/run
As expected, the slope is indeed undefined. The denominator can't be 0 but this one has denominator that's 0 which is undefined.
Meaning that, when the x-value for both ordered pairs are the same, the slope will be undefined.
For the graph, It should be like this below in the picture.
