Answer:
Therefore uncollectibel account expense = 0.22 x 94,000 = $20,680
Explanation:
Uncollectible accounts are determined by the percent-of-sales method to be 22% of credit sales. How much is uncollectible-account expense for 2014?
Uncollectible Accounst will simply be 22% multiplied by the credit sales figure for the year.
Accounts Receivable.....26,000
Allowance for collectible account...1,500
Credit sales for 2014 ...$94,000
Cash Sales for 2014.....28,000
Collection from customers on account...100,000
Therefore uncollectibel account expense = 0.22 x 94,000 = $20,680
Answer:
The consumer price index for 2015 on Planet Econ is 1.25
Explanation:
The formula for computing the consumer price index is given below:
= (Total cost in the current year) ÷ (total cost in the base year)
where,
Total cost in the current year equals to
= (Base year book quantity × current year book price) + (base year hamburgers quantity × current year hamburgers price)
= 10 books × $30 + 25 hamburgers × $3
= $300 + $75
= $375
we use the base year quantity for computing the total cost for the current year.
And, the Total cost in the base year equals to
= (Base year book quantity × base year book price) + (base year hamburgers quantity × base year hamburgers price)
= 10 books × $25 + 25 hamburgers × $2
= $250 + $50
= $300
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the answer would be
= $375 ÷ $300
= 1.25
Hence, The consumer price index for 2015 on Planet Econ is 1.25
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
a) Distinguish between the use of Franchising and Joint Venture as modes of entry into other countries by global businesses.
Franchising consists in the licensing of aspects of production and intellectual property to a another party: the franchise.
A Joint Venture is a business union between two or more parties, in which they split profit as well as costs and responsabilities.
b) What are the respective advantages and disadvantages of both strategies?
Franchising can be a quicker way to expand into foreign markets. The flexibility of the method, and the lower capital requirements are the reason why. This can be seen in the success that American fast-food brands have had using this method to expand in global markets.
A Joint-Venture can be more difficult to use for market expansion, however, it can be more profitable, because the profit will not be split among as many parties as in franchising, and more importantly, the firm maintains a higher control of the operation.
