How did the English Reformation differ from that of Luther and Calvin because Luther and Calvin were said to be workings so as to edit the beliefs of the faith and that of the English Reformation was one that was done out of anger and was an effort to bring an end to all Catholic Churches in the country.
Note that the Christians were said to have took the new religion as a kind of an insult to their customary faith. They still hold the view and believed in the pope still.
<h3>What happened in the English Reformation?</h3>
The Reformation is known to be one that holds some significant effects for England.
Note that the monarch was said to be the head of the Protestant Church of England, and as such, a lot of monasteries were abolished and their wealth taken.
Hence, How did the English Reformation differ from that of Luther and Calvin because Luther and Calvin were said to be workings so as to edit the beliefs of the faith and that of the English Reformation was one that was done out of anger and was an effort to bring an end to all Catholic Churches in the country.
Learn more about Reformation from
brainly.com/question/1175505
#SPJ1
Answer:
because sometimes maps might be off just by a little
I think it is However. I apologize if I was incorrect.
Answer:The reductionist Biomedical model of pain would only see painful molecules and calming molecules, while the Biopsychosocial would go further, complementing the landscape of good and bad molecules with the consideration of emotional, cognitive (interpretive) and behavioral frameworks, all in the environment in which the individual relates the suffering.
Explanation:
Answer: -I
Explanation:The Wilderness Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–577) was written by Howard Zahniser of The Wilderness Society. It created the legal definition of wilderness in the United States, and protected 9.1 million acres (37,000 km²) of federal land.
