Answer:
Explanation:
<h2>
Homotropic effector-</h2>
<h2>Both -</h2>
The phrase 
is relevant and can be applied for homotropic effector molecules since the heterotropic effector molecules have the possibility and affinity to change the sigmoidal curve to a more potential hyperbolic curve contingent upon the allosteric effector to be positive or negative modulator.
The expression isn't relevant for both homotropic and heterotrophic effectors since the two of them can tie to the allosteric site of allosteric enzymatic compounds.
The phrase
is significant and can be applied for both homotropic and heterotropic effectors.
The expression
is significant and applied for homotropic effectors just as when substrate molecules tie to the allosteric site of enzyme then it is regarded as homotropic effectors. The heterotropic effectors are effectors apart from substrate molecules.
The phrase
is not applied and insignificant to none of the heterotropic or homotropic effector molecules since
is significant for the enzymes that obey the Michaelis-Menten equation, but allosteric enzymes do not obey the Michaelis-Menten equation. Homotropic and heterotropic effectors are viable and efficient for allosteric enzymatic chemicals that don't contain
NA? What is that?
Maybe i can help
Answer:
Imagine studying a cell. That cell has billions of things you can learn about. Now imagine 37.2 trillion cells each a little bit different but still similar. Now imagine that multiplied by all the different people there are on earth. Now then include all the other types of living animals.
That's biology
I'm assuming that you want us to tell you what organism does these things. So it would be a plant.
The neutral theory of molecular evolution proposed that most evolutionary changes are the result of the fixation of neutral mutations by genetic drift. Hence, in this model, most genetic changes in a population are the result of constant mutation pressure and genetic drift.