1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following is the best example of imperialism?

History
1 answer:
Nikitich [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:  the annexation of Hawaii in 1898, which allowed the United States to gain possession and control of all ports, buildings, harbors, military equipment, and public property that had formally belonged to the Government of the Hawaiian Islands.

Explanation: hope it helps

You might be interested in
What economic factors contributed to the decline of slavery in the north and the Chesapeake
likoan [24]
Cheesecake I believe so
6 0
3 years ago
Who is the first black president of South Africa ​
schepotkina [342]

Answer: Nelson Mandela

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the overall purpose of the mayflower compact and the Virginia house of burgesses?
Travka [436]
The purpose was to establish a government.
8 0
3 years ago
Discuss how that person exemplified at least three characteristics of great leadership or heroism.
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

Have you ever heard the phrase, "Great leaders are born, not made"? This quote sums up the basic tenant of the great man theory of leadership, which suggests that the capacity for leadership is inborn. According to this theory, you're either a natural born leader or you're not.

The term "Great Man" was used because, at the time, ​leadership was thought of primarily as a male quality, especially in terms of military leadership.

History

The great man theory of leadership became popular during the 19th-century. The mythology behind some of the world's most famous leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi and Alexander the Great helped contribute to the notion that great leaders are born and not made. In many examples, it seems as if the right man for the job seems to emerge almost magically to take control of a situation and lead a group of people into safety or success.

Historian Thomas Carlyle also had a major influence on this theory of leadership, at one point stating that, "The history of the world is but the biography of great men." According to Carlyle, effective leaders are those gifted with divine inspiration and the right characteristics.1  

Some of the earliest research on leadership looked at people who were already successful leaders. These individuals often included aristocratic rulers who achieved their position through birthright. Because people of a lesser social status had fewer opportunities to practice and achieve leadership roles, it contributed to the idea that leadership is an inherent ability.1  

Even today, people often describe prominent leaders as having the right qualities or personality for the position, implying that inherent characteristics are what make these people effective leaders.

Arguments Against the Great Man Theory of Leadership

Sociologist Herbert Spencer suggested that the leaders were products of the society in which they lived. In The Study of Sociology, Spencer wrote, "you must admit that the genesis of a great man depends on the long series of complex influences which has produced the race in which he appears, and the social state into which that race has slowly grown...Before he can remake his society, his society must make him."

One of the key problems with the great man theory of leadership is that not all people who possess the so-called natural leadership qualities actually become great leaders. If leadership was simply an inborn quality, then all people who possess the ​necessary traits would eventually find themselves in leadership roles. Research has instead found that leadership is a surprisingly complex subject and that numerous factors influence how successful a particular leader may or may not be. Characteristics of the group, the leader in power and the situation all interact to determine what type of leadership is needed and the effectiveness of this leadership.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which European country had the first real parliamentary democracy? Britain Spain Germany France
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

Kingdom of Great Britain so Britan

Explanation:

I hope I helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following occurred as a result of India’s partition in 1947? Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • How did the federal government change after the Civil War?
    10·2 answers
  • How effective was the nuclear deterrence in maintaining peace between the United States and the Soviet Union
    7·1 answer
  • In 1877 the United States Army defeated the Nez Perce at the Battle of (a. Whitebird Canyon or
    10·1 answer
  • Why did President Roosevelt push Congress to insert "cash and carry" provisions into the Neutrality Acts? (1 point) to make it p
    13·2 answers
  • Why was the hijrsj important,(A) it marked the begging of the islamic era. (B) it signaled the Muhammad it's no longer going to
    15·1 answer
  • Korea divided at 38th parallel, Hungarian revolution crushed, Missile sites spotted in Cuba are the events in these headlines co
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following events was a direct consequence of the Islamic Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • 3. Give an example of a situation in which a home cook would need to scale a recipe ​
    5·1 answer
  • What were the Black Codes? How did they reflect the reaction of southern white Americans to the end of the war?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!