The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
Each currency has a changing value relative to other currencies. This is referred to as a<u> "currency's exchange rate."</u>
An exchange rate is the rate at which one currency will be exchanged for another, it is additionally viewed as the estimation of one nation's cash in connection to another currency.
Exchange rates are resolved in the foreign exchange market, which is available to an extensive variety of various sorts of purchasers and venders, and where money exchanging is ceaseless: 24 hours daily aside from ends of the week.
Answer:
<u>c. there is the possibility that the funds are used for riskier behavior than the lender agreed to.</u>
Explanation:
True. The term "Moral Hazard" as used in an investment context, often refers to a scenario where one party with a <em>lesser risk burden</em> in a business agreement, <u>deliberately </u>takes investment risk that would be detrimental to others in the agreement who have a higher risk burden.
It is an unethical business practice; a moral hazard, and so acts as a barrier to investors who may want to finance global growth.
When a company buys something on credit it increases account payable, and when a company sells on credit it will increase their account receivable.
This relates to liability of business owners. When a company has unlimited liability and starts losing money, the owners can be personally liable for losses meaning their home and personal assets could be lost. Limited liability means they can only lose the amount that they invested in the company and none of their personal assets.
