Using the Gordon Growth Model (a.k.a. Dividend Discount Model), the intrinsic value of a stock can be calculated, exclusive of current market conditions. In this model, the value of the stock is equated to the present value of the stock's future dividends.
<span>Value of stock (P0) = D1 / (k - g)
</span>where
D1<span> = </span><span>expected annual </span>dividend<span> per share in the following year </span>
<span>k = the investor's discount rate or required </span>rate of return
g = the expected dividend growth rate
<u>From the problem:</u>
The value of stock is $10.80
D1 is $0.40
g is 0.08
k is unknown
Solution:
Rearranging the equation for Gordon Growth Model to solve for k:
k = (D1/P0) + g
Substituting the variables with the given values,
k = (0.40/10.80) + 0.08
k = 0.1170
In percent form, this is
0.1170 * 100% = 11.70%.
Thus, the total rate of return on the stock is 11.70%.
An efficiency ratio known as the capital intensity ratio provides valuable insight into a company's financial situation.
Capital Intensity Ratio = Total Assets/Total Revenue
Return on assets = Net income/Total Assets
Total Assets = Net income/Return on Assets= $389,100/0.086
Total Revenue = Net income/Net Profit Margin = $389,100/0.028
Capital intensity ratio = ($389,100 /0.086) / ($389,100 / 0.028) =0.33
This ratio reveals how much capital or other resources a company has to have in order to make single dollar in sales. This ratio is the inverse of the asset turnover ratio, making it simple to calculate the capital intensity ratio if you already know the asset turnover ratio. For all capital-intensive firms, we require a good or higher capital intensity ratio. A company that invests a significant amount of capital in its manufacturing process is said to be capital-intensive. E.g., Power generating facilities. A company that has made significant investments in assets to generate income has a high capital intensity ratio (CIR). A company with a low CIR is able to produce larger revenues while owning fewer assets. As a result, businesses can use this ratio to modify their capital budgeting and planning.
Learn more about Capital Intensity Ratio here
brainly.com/question/14594640
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
An increase in the cost of fishing will lead to a decrease in the supply of fishes. This happens because the suppliers will be able to supply less at the same cost.
So the supply curve will move to the left. This leftward shift in the supply curve will cause the equilibrium price to increase and the equilibrium quantity to decrease.
All the other options would have caused the equilibrium quantity to increase either through increased demand or increased supply.
Answer:
C seems the most reasonable
