1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
3 years ago
5

What did the kings of kush do that was different from the Egyptian pharaohs

History
1 answer:
ss7ja [257]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Kush was an empire to the south of Egypt and was built at the base of the mountains. Another difference between Kush and Egypt is that queens ruled Kush, unlike the male kings and pharaohs that ruled Egypt. They also built tombs like the Egyptians did but the Kush generally built tombs with flat roofs on them.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

You might be interested in
Help please x.x
marin [14]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The answer is trade. I just took this test.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Concurent powers are
anzhelika [568]
Concurrent powers are powers<span> in nations with a federal system of government that are shared by both the federal government and each constituent political unit such as a state or provence</span>
6 0
3 years ago
How does the "Elastic clause" make it easier for our government to function?
bekas [8.4K]
The answer is in the 'necessary and proper clause' of the U.S.<span> Constitution, better known as the '</span>elastic clause<span>,' which allows Congress to </span>make<span> laws it needs to carry out its own powers.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did this address serve as an assurance that the rebels were not enemies of the people or the Revolution?
kap26 [50]

Answer:

Daniel Gray's A Proclamation of Shaysite Grievances (1786)

Explanation:

-focuses on Shay's Rebellion (Massachusetts farmers who were in debt and pleaded for paper money = poor farmers rebelled against the new govt.)

-the rebels were not enemies of the people but simply wanted change

-the rebels perceived their cause to be a matter of economics (debt collection)

3 0
2 years ago
Explain the strengths of the Articles of Confederation and how people reacted to this document.
Doss [256]
The major downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply weakness. The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts.

Hope this helped! :)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was most important to the development of civilization? A/ gathering B/migration C/bunting D/agriculture
    15·2 answers
  • Why did zhou kings use the idea of the mandate of heaven
    13·2 answers
  • What is the first primeminster of pakistan
    6·2 answers
  • British troops fired on a crowd of colonist in boston because
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of great britain during World War II?
    11·2 answers
  • what information in the graph supports this statenent from the text. "New technology had a heavier impact on the north than on t
    9·1 answer
  • The Monroe doctrine can be viewed as a moral opposition to?​
    7·2 answers
  • Help pls!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Look at the map and then respond to the prompt.
    5·1 answer
  • Addressed advantages and limitations of model including: size, scale, properties and materials.​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!