Answer:
People base many decisions on affective forecasts, predictions about their emotional reactions to future events. They often display an impact bias, overestimating the intensity and duration of their emotional reactions to such events. One cause of the impact bias is focalism, the tendency to underestimate the extent to which other events will influence our thoughts and feelings. Another is people's failure to anticipate how quickly they will make sense of things that happen to them in a way that speeds emotional recovery. This is especially true when predicting reactions to negative events: People fail to anticipate how quickly they will cope psychologically with such events in ways that speed their recovery from them. Several implications are discussed, such as the tendency for people to attribute their unexpected resilience to external agents.
Explanation:
A shrinking Pentagon budget, I think.
1-intolerable acts
2-sugar acts
3-stamp act
Answer:
authoritarian
Explanation:
This way of rule has a main leader followed along by other smaller leaders who usually are generals. They take away your given freedoms and some of your rights to ensure complete control over a country. An example of this could be north Korea's strong grip on the people. Because the people don't know what a better country looks like (through blockage of media) they have no need to rebel against there leader, they think that what's going on there makes them superior and it is a norm across the world when really it isnt.
Answer:
Anti-Federalists
Explanation:
The anti-federalists thought that the constitution gave the republic's president too much power and were afraid that this would generate abuse of power and even allow the establishment of a dictatorial government that was exactly the opposite of what they wanted for the country. For this reason, they demanded that a declaration of rights be added to the constitution so that the population had its rights guaranteed and irrevocated even in the face of the president's power.
