1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qaws [65]
3 years ago
14

Why did Warren Harding not stop the scandal at its beginning?

History
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Warren Harding didn’t care to get involved in the scandal and other scandals that occurred during his administration, but which were completely exposed after his death.

Investigations revealed that he knew about the scandal, but didn’t make any effort to expose and stop it because he was afraid it could affect his position as president.

Warren Harding’s reputation as president was tarnished because he put a lot of wrong people in positions of power. The members of Harding’s cabinet—known as the “Ohio Gang”—had many substantial allegations of corruption leveled against them.

At a certain time, worried president Harding informed a newspaper editor, William Allen White that, although he (Harding) could easily handle his enemies, he had problem handling his friends.

There is another incident which strongly supports the notion that Warren Harding didn’t care to get involved in the scandal: In June, 1923, while Harding was making a presidential visit to Alaska, he asked the Commerce Secretary at the time (Herbert Hoover), if he was aware of any great scandal in their administration, and whether the nation would benefit anything if he exposes, or buries it.

Hoover responded by advising the president (Harding) to expose any scandal, but Harding refused to do so because he was afraid of political repercussions.

You might be interested in
How was the wave of U.S. immigration in the late 1800s different from the previous wave of immigration in the mid-1800s?
Luda [366]
The first wave consisted of mostly Irish, German immigrants. Or, rather, mostly Western Europeans. 

<span>The second wave consisted of Italians, Slavs, Hungarians, etc. Or, mostly Eastern European.

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
5 0
4 years ago
How would you describe Celtic society and explain the Celts' lack of state building?
marshall27 [118]
The Celts were not an unified state but rather a group of numerous tribes that often didn't even speak the same language. They were found all around Europe and were mostly Warriors who build their societies around kinship. They were good farmers and mostly were common people. They didn't have a strong unified state because they lived day in day out, women would give birth to children and men would work on the land and occasionally fight against invaders. There was no spirit of a great Celtic nation.
5 0
3 years ago
In what ways do the colonists deserve better treatment?
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Fair taxes

Local self-rule

Representation in the British parliament

Explanation:

American colonists deserve better treatment in many ways. Some of which includes:

1. Fair taxes: American colonists deserve to have a fair tax system. Towards the beginning of the American Revolutionary War, the British government levied so many taxes on the colonists which were considered unreasonable and exorbitant to pay.

2. Local self-rule: American colonists deserve local self-rule. All the governors in the thirteen colonies were appointed by the British Crown and they all came from Great Britain.

3.Representation in the British parliament: The American colonists deserve representation in the British parliament. This is based on the fact that they need to have people to represent them in conveying what they want and need in the colonies.

5 0
3 years ago
Why do historians continue to gather historical evidence for even well-known events?​
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

so that history will not be forgotten

Explanation:

if history is not well documented it will simply go unnoticed and undocumented

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the Articles of Confederation, how was the federal government structured?
shutvik [7]
The federal government was structured as an absolute monarchy with the people having no power whatsoever

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mikhail gorbachev sought to change the status quo in the soviet union with his restructuring of the soviet economic and politica
    14·1 answer
  • In 1965 President Johnson immediately used the authority of the gulf of Tonkin resolution to
    11·2 answers
  • Who were the two participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858? Daniel Webster and John C. Calhoun
    10·2 answers
  • What punishment would a violator of the Sherman antitrust act face
    13·2 answers
  • The "War to end all _,” lasted less than two decades after the Treaty of
    12·1 answer
  • The Democratic party nominee for president in 1896 was ____; the Republicans nominated ____; and the Populists endorsed ____. a
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the Roman Empire produce more coins?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the conflict between England and France called?
    6·1 answer
  • Which city is further north: Athens or Sardis?
    13·1 answer
  • How was the creation of money handled under the articles of confederation?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!