Taking WH, huh? =P
Pakistan and India, both remained nonaligned
The Brown vs Board of Education legal case was a very important part of history which essentially ended segregation among blacks and whites in schools and started to integrate them together.
Brown vs Board of Education started in the 1950's when a young African American girl had to walk over a mile to school everyday, but there was a school for whites very close by.
This was when the NAACP, which advocated for the rights and freedoms of colored people came in. They believed segregation among schools and "separate but equal" was in fact <em>not</em> equal.
Eventually, the Brown vs Board of Education case went to the Supreme Court, when finally in 1954 the case was won by the NAACP and integration between public schools began.
Many citizens and schools were against integration and many more rulings with the Supreme Court had to occur, but finally a few decades later all of the public schools in the United States were integrated among races and the "separate but equal" principle was no longer.
It’s may be B. That makes the most sense in my opinion.
Answer:
one example of conservative view of the government is The government should protect individuals' freedoms
Explanation:
Conservatives tend to favor limited government and more freedom among individuals and the market. In the conservative view, the only job that government has is to regulate the market, protect the border, and provide security measures from military.
Answer:
No this is not legal due to the Second Amendment of the Constitution. This states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The second amendment was tested recently with the Supreme Court case DC v. Heller, where the Court ruled that a ban on handguns in Washington, D.C. was unconstitutional. So the government cannot ban all sales of firearms and destroy guns at will (this would probably be logistically impossible as well), due to the right to carry a firearm for self defense.
