Answer:
There is nothing inherently wrong with lobbying. Lobbying encourages people to play an active role in their government — it’s protected by the First Amendment as our right “to petition the government.”
Explanation: to me this can be an opinion.
According to the Act, a summary conviction carries a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a potential sentence of six months in jail if the person commits copyright infringement for the first time.
<h3>
How hard is it to sue for copyright infringement?</h3>
It's a challenging process, especially for independent contractors and small business owners. Even while the copyright violation may be emotionally upsetting, you should also take your financial losses into account.
According to the Copyright Act, criminal proceedings may be brought if the infringement is very severe. According to the Act, a summary conviction has a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a maximum sentence of six months in jail, whereas an indictment-based conviction carries a maximum fine of $1 million and/or a maximum sentence of five years in jail.
Learn more about Copyright Infringement here:
brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
