Answer:
The third option, a rational number
like 1/5 + 2.5 is still rational (but neither irrational nor whole/an integer)
it would be 0.2 + 2.5 = 2.7 btw
or
1/5 + 5/2
= 2/10 + 25/10
= 27/10
Answer:
choosing two socks from a drawer of black and white socks without replacement
Step-by-step explanation:
Dependent events have results that depend on each other. When I take one sock out, there are less socks in the drawer to pick from. The probability of picking a certain sock changes because the number of socks are different when I do not put the sock back. That makes the events dependent.
When I put the sock back, the probability goes back to what it was before I took the sock, and now the results do not depend on each other, so when they are replaced, they are independent
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to use the properties shown below to solve this:
1. ![\sqrt[n]{x^a} =x^{\frac{a}{n}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7Bx%5Ea%7D%20%3Dx%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7Ba%7D%7Bn%7D%7D)
2. 
3. 
Area of a triangle is given by 1/2 * base * height, so we do that and simplify:
Answer:
The answer is A I just looked it up on mathaway and it is never wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
Standard form always has the largest coefficients first
Answer:
hello!!!
We will learn it simple method,we know that multiplication of whole numbers is repeated addition. For example
3*4= 4+4+4
in this same way we can say that
[-12]=(-3)+(-3)+(-3)+(-3)
also,
4(*-3)=(-12)
for the second equation we can take it same as the above one
So it make no diffrence when we multiplied integers as (positive)*(negative) OR (NEGATIVE)*(POSITIVE)
And so now we can say
FOR ANY TWO POSITIVE INTEGER a and b WE CAN SAY
(-a) *(b) = (-b)*(a) = -(a*b)
HOPE FULLY U MAY LIKED MY ANSWER GIVE POSITIVE FEEDBACK AND IF WANTS ANYTHING OTHER YOU MAY ASK ME IN COMMENT
