1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksivusya [100]
3 years ago
8

Name two laws that protect citizens against xenophobia

English
2 answers:
Ainat [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act, 2000 (PEPUDA or the Equality Act, Act No. 4 of 2000) is a comprehensive South African anti-discrimination law. It prohibits unfair discrimination by the government and by private organisations and individuals and forbids hate speech and harassment

enyata [817]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

\huge{\boxed{\boxed{\tt { Xenophobia}}}} \

In the U. S. there are no laws against xenophobia. Just as there are no laws against racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. Whether some people agree with it or not, people are allowed (at least for the present) to form opinions for themselves. These opinions may be considered awful by the majority of the people but that really doesn’t matter.

On the other hand, if you act in a malicious manner or you take some discriminatory action, based on these opinions there may be laws against those actions.

So while there is no law saying you can’t be xenophobic, if you lynch a person for the sole reason he/she is from another country you have committed at least two crimes. The first being murder. The second being a defined as a hate crime.

The preservation of human rights in any part of the world plays a key role in maintaining the peace and liberty of its citizens. In this case, <u>equality under the law plays a key role in preserving these rights. The government and its citizens are obligated to honour and respect the Bill of Rights and the constitution for the country to run smoothly. </u>

According to Section 9 of the Constitution of South Africa,

<em>Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and the benefit of the law. Prohibited grounds of discrimination include race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth. </em>

In <u>section 12</u> of the constitution, everyone living in South Africa has the right to freedom and security. Therefore, <u>no one has the right to violate or mistreat citizens for whatever reasons they presume to be right. Consequently, it is to paramount for every citizen of the country to abide by this law.</u> The jurisdiction protects citizens of the country. For the government and other governing bodies to get to amicable solutions, it is imperative to hold dialogues to get to the root of these discriminatory acts against its people.

You might be interested in
Can someone help me please
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

u sick Bayer he u ur heheheh

7 0
3 years ago
Compare your plot description with that of the
alex41 [277]

Answer:

Comparing between the plot and description which remains different from one and other.  

Explanation:

The elements of exposition, the role of the said characters in developing the plot. The plot matches simultaneously, however their results suffer to a great extent. Analysis of events related to this conclusion. There should be an analysis of events, which is interesting as well

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A distinguished man should be as particular about his last words as he is about his last breath. He should write them out on a s
MissTica

Answer:

I would say "A" is correct.

Explanation:

Based off the passage, I would say letter A is the most accurate. To which it is also very true. We tend to bottle things deep inside until it is too late.

4 0
3 years ago
While I have lived in my home, my rent has increased every year. My salary has remained the same for three years. Next year, I w
morpeh [17]

Answer:

A. Inductive, weak, uncogent

Explanation:

  • Correcty answer is Inductive, weak, uncogent, Because the inference claim is about gastrointestinal certainty, and about probability, it is an inspiration.
  • This is a weak argument because the conclusion is not true if the premise is true. It is also an irrational argument because an argument must be strong in order to be strong.
4 0
3 years ago
Which one is NOT a type of writing? <br> A. Positive B. Informative C. Narrative D. Expository
lana66690 [7]

Answer: a. positive .

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can anyone quickly just make a poem from there head that cant be haiku but has to have any of these words in it? id really appre
    15·1 answer
  • The series of events that makeup the actual story of a play is its
    12·1 answer
  • Which word is not related to a place?
    12·1 answer
  • The ____ dog sat on the brown _____
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these excerpts from Antigone demonstrates Creon's hubris?
    12·1 answer
  • Decomposition of rocks,soil,and minerals as a result of direct contact with the atmosphere​
    6·2 answers
  • In the book 'the road' between the pages of 26-75 what relation encounters with trucks?​
    6·1 answer
  • Sam and cat or victorius or kcuf em
    9·1 answer
  • What viewpoint about German soldiers does Maupassant convey in this excerpt of "Two Friends"?
    10·1 answer
  • Jay asked, “where is the key to the safe”?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!