1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna11 [192]
3 years ago
10

What was the effect of the Paris mobs overthrow the monarchy of Louis-philippe

History
1 answer:
Agata [3.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Loyalty to nationality, not a monarchy.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the course of the war affect public opinion, and subsequently British leaders in Britain?
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

lol

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What would have been a better way to stop hitler instead of war?
suter [353]

Answer:

Explanation:

We probable could have stopped Hitler but American Jews decided upon an economical war to get rid of the Nazi regime thus led us into war as well.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were ideas that conflicted with the catholic church called
Komok [63]
The Counter-Reformation (Latin: Contrareformatio), also called the Catholic Reformation (Latin: Reformatio Catholica) or the Catholic Revival,[1] was the period of Catholic resurgence that was initiated in response to the Protestant Reformation.

Source - Wikipedia
8 0
3 years ago
President truman's main reason for using the atomic bomb against japan was to
Mrrafil [7]
It was because they attack pearl
3 0
2 years ago
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was an effect of the higher demand for key crops in Louisiana during World War II?
    10·1 answer
  • With what purpose did the Whitmans
    10·2 answers
  • Fidel Castro, his brother, Raul Castro, and Che Guevara were angry about Batista's dictatorship government. The Castro brothers
    10·1 answer
  • Where did Christianity originate?
    13·2 answers
  • How did Charlemagne rule his kingdom
    13·1 answer
  • Describe how a mass culture deveoped in america
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP 1 MINUTE​
    8·2 answers
  • The united states grew from west to east. is true or false?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these were important in both Confucianism and Buddhism?
    13·1 answer
  • In ancient Mesopotamia, which of the<br> following was in control of the city-<br> states?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!