1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fynjy0 [20]
3 years ago
12

Why would americans might have felt threatened by foreign ideas?

History
2 answers:
coldgirl [10]3 years ago
5 0
American people generally believe that the ideals of the founding fathers are the best ideals because of things such as democracy, unalienable rights, the constitution with its amendments, and similar things. Whenever someone would show up who would claim otherwise that person would be accused of being a traitor or a spy or something similar. This was especially important during the red scare when they tried to fight communists in the US more than anything else.
murzikaleks [220]3 years ago
4 0

Simply because they were different
They did not fit with american government and society
Socialist and anarchists were unpatriotic (opposed the war)
Anarchists believed in violence and had targeted americans with bombs
After the war, americans were distrustful of foreigners and their ideas
You might be interested in
Which of the following is a belief if islam that reflects the influence if christianity and judaism
vagabundo [1.1K]
How is Islam similar to Christianity and Judaism?
Judaism Christianity, and Islam, in contrast to Hinduism and Buddhism, are all monotheistic faiths that worship the God of Adam, Abraham, and Moses-creator, sustainer, and lord of the universe. They share a common belief in the oneness of God (monotheism), sacred history (history as the theater of God's activity and the encounter of God and humankind), prophets and divine revelation, angels, and Satan. All stress moral responsibility and accountability, Judgment Day, and eternal reward and punishment.
7 0
2 years ago
In a modern world, many countries with kings or queens have evolved into constitutional democracies. In these countries, monarch
nevsk [136]
Monarchs are mostly popular figureheads. They keep the country stable with their presence. Some countries still have Absolute Monarchs (A King or Emporer with all power). Most kings and queens are exempt from being convicted of crimes, and can desolve parliament and remove anyone from the government.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the Old Regime, the people of France belonged to one of three estates. What was the basis of these divisions?
Vinvika [58]
The basis of the division was social class I believe it was devised between the wealthy, middle, and lower class the lower class included slaves and indebted servants
5 0
1 year ago
1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.
fredd [130]

Answer:

To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful. 

The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's. 

Explanation:

On Edge 2020.

6 0
3 years ago
How was the Roosevelt Corollary different from the Monroe Doctrine? The Roosevelt Corollary said the United States could exercis
Rufina [12.5K]

I think that you just answered your own question in the question you asked.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The professions of pharmacy and Medicine begin to split up during Renaissance?
    13·1 answer
  • Document 6
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the d`etente end
    8·1 answer
  • What happened on 9/11? details please
    12·2 answers
  • Even when it is outlawed, art finds a means of expressions.”
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Han Dynasty promote order in Chinese society?
    12·1 answer
  • How did traders help islam spread
    8·1 answer
  • The three causes of the War of 1812 were:
    11·1 answer
  • What reasons does the author give the support the claim that it is difficult for a message to move people to take action?
    9·1 answer
  • HELLLLPPPP LAST QUESTION!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!