1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NNADVOKAT [17]
2 years ago
11

Abolition of ownership and equal protection of the law are two of the effects from ratification of the fifteenth amendment? True

False
History
1 answer:
Liula [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The 15th Amendment gave black American ex-slaves the right to vote, equal protection of the law and right to ownership of property. This was passed by Congress in 1869 and ratified in 1870.

Therefore, abolition of ownership and equal protection of the law are two of the effects from ratification of the fifteenth amendment.

You might be interested in
The year abraham lincoln was elected and southern states began leaving the U.S
noname [10]
1861 is the correct answer
5 0
2 years ago
¿cuáles fueron los cambios que trajo consigo el desarrollo
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

What were the changes brought about by the development

economic does of the Mexican miracle in everyday life

Explanation:

Hop this helps!!

4 0
2 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLYEST What was a religious goal of the Crusades? to reunite the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches to r
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

To retake control of the Holy Land

Explanation:

The goal of the Crusades was to take back Jerusalem from Muslim control.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an effect of the Battle of Tippecanoe?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

Battle of Tippecanoe, lithograph by Kurz and Allison c. 1889. Defeat at Fallen Timbers and the subsequent treaties did not end American Indian resistance to U.S. expansion into the Ohio Valley. The U.S. victory broke Tecumseh's power and ended the threat of an Indian confederation.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Do you think the supreme court should have a police force with the power to enforce its decisions
egoroff_w [7]
No, the Supreme Court should not have a police force with the power to enforce its decisions. This is for a couple of reasons: with the Supreme Court being the highest court and one of the three branches of government, it already has a large amount of power and does not need more, there are jobs such as parole officers to look over the actions of criminals after court and the police force is sufficient enough to tackle any problems as many problems as it can with criminality.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • As part of the New Deal, the Securities and
    12·1 answer
  • Would you consider Roosevelt a strong president or a weak one? How did his leadership abilities compare to those of other presid
    12·1 answer
  • True or false jamestown was first under a royal charter
    9·2 answers
  • The dawes plan 1924 showed americas
    14·1 answer
  • What steps did the U.S government take to control the economy and public opinion during world war 1
    5·1 answer
  • The President is only allowed to serve two full terms in office, preventing one person from being President for too long. Why do
    9·1 answer
  • Who was Chief Justice for more than 30 years? *
    5·1 answer
  • Drag each label to the correct location on the image.
    7·2 answers
  • What role did religion play in the policies of Charles V?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Patriots try to encourage colonists to join their cause?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!