Answer:
All of the above given options applied.
Explanation:
Yeomans farmers are those who owned his own modest farm and worked it primarily with family labor. They remained the embodiment of the ideal American as a result of their honest, virtuous, hardworking, and independent nature of its members.
<em>In order to maintain such traits, they established communities where all the yeoman farmers lives in and interact with each other. They yeomen farmers represented the largest number of white farmers in the revolutionary era.</em>
Answer:
The Killke people occupied the region from 900 to 1200 CE, prior to the arrival of the Inca in the 13th century. Carbon-14 dating of Saksaywaman, the walled complex outside Cusco, established that Killke constructed the fortress about 1100 CE. The Inca later expanded and occupied the complex in the 13th century.
Traductor!! El pueblo Killke ocupó la región del 900 al 1200 d.C., antes de la llegada de los incas en el siglo XIII. La datación por carbono-14 de Saksaywaman, el complejo amurallado en las afueras de Cusco, estableció que Killke construyó la fortaleza alrededor del 1100 d.C. El Inca luego expandió y ocupó el complejo en el siglo XIII.
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'm literally learning this now in APUSH. In 1914 which is the era of the gilded age people were dependent on railroads and oil. Thanks to help from Carnegie (and the other 4 men) (around 1914) and steel, the US economy rose back from its divided chaos.
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
The Crusades were military expeditions organized by western European Christians to keep in check the spread of Islam and recapture former Christian territories that now were Muslim. The Crusades began in 1095 and lasted for almost 200 years.
To some historians, even when these religious wars presented gruesome results, they ultimately were a factor in European civilization development as the growth of the system of indulgences and the reinforced link between Western Christendom, feudalism, and militarism, led to the Protestant Reformation.
