Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Cash receipts in month 4
:
Month 4 sales = (30% × 30,000) + (70% × 30000 × 60%)
= $21,600
Month 3 sales = 50,000 × 70% × 25%
= $8,750
Month 2 sales = 70,000 × 70% × 12%
= $5,880
Thus, total cash receipts:
= Month 4 sales + Month 3 sales + Month 2 sales
= $21,600 + $8,750 + $5,880
= $36,230
Answer:
a.) matching
Explanation:
Matching principle is the accounting principle in which the expenses incurred should be recorded at the same period when the revenues are earned. Also the business incurred the expenses in order to earn the revenues
So as per the given situation since Bob recognized the expenses but it is not paid so here he is using the matching principle
Therefore the option a is correct
Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.
We have
that
Cost
total-------------------------$10 coupon+$30.25=$40.25
<span>ice
cream costs $1.50*2</span>=
-$3
<span>admission
cost $18*2</span>= -$36
<span>soda
cost $X*1</span>=
-$X
$40.25=$3+$36+$X
$X= $ 1.25
a
soda costs at the amusement park $ <span>1.25</span>
Whats the answer options you get
