Answer: b It shows that growing up is very much different from getting older, and Hood states that in his last few lines, "it was childish ignorance" shows that he has grown older, but still retains all the childish idealism in hoping to become a boy again. Practicing for exam... :)
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
The answer that makes the most sense is D) Text Details.
A isn't the answer because this is something we would hear/read about first to know what is happening and to get details of who the character is before diving into the story. This is information about a character.
B isn't the answer because conclusions would be made near the end or middle of the story, where we make inferences and conclusions of what happens when the story ends. This would be Inference.
C isn't the answer because we are being told the traits of a person. This answer and A could possibly be background knowledge, as we get to know the character before the story begins so we aren't lost, we could learn about these during the story as well. This is information about a character.
D is correct because we are given text details about the story/character. We would be given things like how they ended up in the beginning situation, where they are from, why they are here, etc.
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</em></u>
Answer:
SHORT VERSION: There is no smoke without fire is a proverb or saying which explains about some rumours or assumptions.
Above saying explains that as smoke won't be liberated unless there is presence of fire any rumor or news wont get spread without any initiative.
So behind any rumor the will be a chance of truth in most of the cases.
LONGER VERSION: As the saying goes, "there's no smoke without fire", it is rue to say that there is always some truth to whatever has bee implied. This is used majorly in the case of spreading rumors or some events though without the presence of any evidence to prove it.
When anything is implied, but there is no proof whatsoever, it is safe to assume that there is some truth to whatever has been implied. Once a person says something like an accusation or even a false rumor or implication, there must be some truth behind it for the rumor to start. If someone implied that he heard someone tell about an upcoming market fair, it can be implied that he got the information from somewhere else or he wouldn't have just come up with the knowledge by himself. he heard someone say something about it and then decided to tell someone else and thus help spread the information. Though he did not possess any evidence or proof of the fair, there is some truth behind it. Just like smoke cannot come or be made by itself and requires a fire to get smoke, there is always some truth behind any accusation or rumor.
Explanation:
It's 'A'. The the highest part of the wave
The choice which best describes the author's ad hominem attack on department store proprietors is
- The author denounces their phony sympathy for poor people.
<h3>What is ad hominem?</h3>
This is the a fallacy in which someone's claim is being attacked based on that person being inconsistent. It occurs when you irrelevantly attack the person instead of addressing the person's argument.
The author denounces their phony sympathy for poor people. This means the author denounce the departmental store proprietors fake sympathy for poor people.
Department stores are usually a store mostly patronized by high income earners and important people in the society. So, it is a fallacy if the store proprietors of departmental stores sympathize with poor people because they didn't put poor people into consideration before establishing their store.
Learn more about fallacy:
brainly.com/question/25146555
