Answer:
C) Gives a player an advantage
Explanation:
I don't know the context of the question, but it makes the most sense.
Answer: suggesting MDM solution and also linking MDM to both the salesforce and sap. More so, integrating SAP with both Salesforce and legacy CRM.
NB: Don't ever integrate legacy CRM to Salesforce
Explanation:
It should be noted that the best recommendation that could be given in order to keep data in synch b/w Salesforce, legacy CRM and SAP is by suggesting MDM solution and also linking MDM to both the salesforce and sap. More so, integrating SAP with both Salesforce and legacy CRM.
NB: Don't ever integrate legacy CRM to Salesforce
Answer:
Explanation:
false. many elements means a complicated picture, not a simple one.
Answer:
The answer is "Option d"
Explanation:
In this question, the easiest way that will save the payment on your database in such a process ID-sorting list would be to mark a payment, that's been recorded mostly on the database whenever this payment became used serial number is not transaction ID, and the wrong choice can be defined as follows:
- In choice a, It is wrong because it may be processed, however, payments aren't entered through our process, which does not help remove older.
- In choice b, the unordered list would not enable any transaction to only be retrieved, that's why it is wrong.
- In choice c, it will not be helpful because the includes video is either begin or complete the payment, it will not be helpful to hold it with transaction time.
- In choice e, this approach won't help to identify the payments since one date will have a lot of payments over a certain account.
