In a nutshell, the protective tariffs were responsible for the development of the economy in the north but had the opposite impact in the south where they had the opposite effect.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south?</h3>
Generally, One of the economic factors that contributed to the escalating tensions between the North and the South was the protective tariff. In terms of its economy, the North had developed into an industrialized region and had a large number of enterprises. On the other hand, the South maintained a significant reliance on agricultural production.
To assist the Northern Industries, high protective tariffs were imposed on commodities imported from other countries. Because of this, additional goods had to be purchased from northern vendors.
The South was forced to pay a higher price for the items that they imported from Europe as a result of this tariff, which benefited the North but put a bigger burden on the South.
To summarize, the protective tariffs contributed to the expansion of the economy in the north while having the opposite effect in the south.
Read more about the economy
brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ1
CQ
Which of these measures contributed to an increase in the economic tensions that existed between the North and the South?
Dred Scott decision
Protective levies on imports
Bleeding Kansas
The election of Lincoln
The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become. I believe so.
Answer:
<h3>1. General Washington decided not to impose a battlefield strategy on his field commanders.</h3>
<h3>2. Washington decided to oversee renovations on Mount Vernon during the most tenuous year of the Revolution.</h3>
Answer:
According to the text The Organization Man written by William H. Whyte, Jr., the conflict between American individualism and life in the organization is that individualism preaches that man should be responsible for his achievements, but life in the organization causes the individual to depend on other individuals to achieve some achievement.
Explanation:
William H. Whyte, Jr. describes life in the organization as a group of middle-class individuals who have a stable life that depends on the joint work of several people and that this joint work allows this economic and social stabilization. However, this set of individuals must be maintained, since the success of one depends on the work of the other. This goes entirely against American individualism, which encouraged each individual to pursue their own rise, whether social or economic, or even academic. This generates a conflict in the values of society that can generate contradictory concepts that show that you must be responsible for your success, however, you can see people who have a good life and are not the only ones responsible for their success.
Yes because a lot of things can be done with words, look at Ghandi or Martin Luther King Junior's "I have a Dream" speech.
