The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
<h3>What is Inductive Reasoning?</h3>
Inductive reasoning is seen as a kind of a process or a method that is known to be used in the drawing of conclusions.
This can be done by going from a particular point to a general point and it is known to be one that is often contrasted with deductive reasoning.
Therefore, based on the above, The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
Learn more about reasoning from
brainly.com/question/25175983
#SPJ1
Answer:
d. France
Explanation:
The French and Indian War was ended by the Treaty of Paris, which gave control of all French land in North America to England.
Answer:
A- "national and state governments share power"
Fed and state governments have similar and contrasting powers.
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
One reason France sent explorers to North America in the 1500s was to start settlements in the Americas.
