1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
2 years ago
8

Do you believe that all individuals have the same ability to reach their dreams?

History
2 answers:
goblinko [34]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

in a perfect world, the answer would be "Yes, all individual have the same ability to reach their dream." However, this is not a perfect world. So, "No, I do not believe all individuals have the ability to reach their dreams," let alone, ever given the belief, fortitude, or option to think/believe they could.

Explanation:

Some people will naturally be limited by their personality (or mentality, if you like.) A persons "drive" to reach their dreams could be halted by any number of things. Such as maturity, IQ, mental awareness, social status, the way they were raised, as well as the environment to which they were raised, and even a personality defects like being Narcissistic, dishonest, or having been raised around moral corruption can all be factors that might stand In a person's way.

But when it all comes down to the bare facts, a person's disposition in life could be either an anchor, (so to speak) holding them back like proverbial quicksand......

Or it could act as a catalyst, rocketing them towards a future that only some can literally only dream of.

in my opinion though, there is honestly only one reason (or theory,) as to why some people have a greater advantage/ability of reaching their dreams..... This would be the environment and or the manner in which a person was raised.

A mentally and or physically abused person is less likely to have the confidence and or know how to achieve their dreams. While a child raised in an encouraging environment, where their parents showed them love, as well as nurtured their curiosity and drive for life.... might grown up "knowing" their dreams were attainable, and therefore, knew their ability for success was gaurenteed or at the very least, a likely scenario.

Growing up in poverty Vs. being raised in a family with lucrative funds/fortune, will also affect an individual's belief and or ability to reach their dreams. Purhaps the poverty stricken, abused child was brought up never thinking it was an option or even a possibility to begin with.... so why bother trying.

My apologies, that was a long winded answer, but I hope I came across making a little sense... or at least it didn my head. LOL.

GOOD LUCK!!

Vlad1618 [11]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Depends on the person really. But overall, yes I believe a person could achieve their dreams if they put their minds to it. You just have to have the right mentality to do so. If your a person who thinks "they will never achieve this" or "I cant do it" Then you'll never make it with that attitude. But if your a person who has a positive attitude to what they want to achieve you will one day. Get your work done and stay positive for the end goal.

Explanation:

Hope this helps (:

You might be interested in
What is a Private property
Reil [10]

Answer:

private property is a legal decision for the ownership of the property by non governmental legal entities.

7 0
2 years ago
Suppose a country comes out of world war 2 with increased territory but much structural damage. It employs a commandshow has the
abruzzese [7]

Answer:  As with any well thought out and planned packaging scheme, the science of

military packaging for the United States Government developed from a well recognized logistical

need. This science has evolved over the course of its life to accommodate the many technology

changes in how the military distributes its supplies. It remains a dynamic force that can either

provide a positive or negative contribution to the success of military missions. Unlike most elements

of military doctrine, military packaging is rarely understood and appreciated for its contributions,

thus making it a prime target for criticisms from uninformed opinions.

The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware of the basic reasons behind why military

packaging exists. This paper will review the many historic factors that first led military leaders to

recognize the need to protect supplies and equipment, and then follow the evolution of the science of

military packaging through current day practices.

GENESIS: The need for specific military procedures and requirements on how to package materiel

first surfaced on two different fronts. The Army had run sustainment exercises to Iceland during the

summer of 1941, and experienced high levels of supply losses that troop units attributed to bad

packaging. The same problem hit the Navy quite dramatically during the amphibious operations at

Guadalcanal in 1942. The commercial packaging that the Army, Navy and Marine Corps used during

the early months of World War II colossally failed to serve its intended purpose, and seriously

jeopardized the War Department's and Navy Department's abilities to sustain operations then being

planned. No one in either of those Departments had paid attention to the changes that had occurred in

packaging designs since Armistice Day.

In 1918, the most common shipping containers for military supplies were wood boxes, crates,

kegs and barrels. These were very much like the common commercial shipping containers of that

era, and were well-suited for all types of supply distribution environments. These containers were

heavy-duty, sturdy designs, generally built by craftsmen. With proper care, some surviving examples

of these containers could be readily used today as intended.

Immediately prior to World War II, military planners failed to recognize that the packaging they

had been receiving with their supplies would not meet their vital needs for overseas operations.

Industry had recognized that they could lower costs and improve profit margins by getting their

products to market in suitable packaging that weighed less and cost less to produce than traditional

packaging. In 1914, American railroads, who at the time were carrying most of the freight in the

United States, recognized and authorized the use of corrugated and solid fiberboard shipping

containers for packing many different types of products. Motor carriers, in turn, followed the

railroads' example in 1935 when they adopted their own packaging rules that often called for

fiberboard boxes. The United States Treasury Department issued the first federal specifications for

corrugated and solid "fiber boxes" in 1930 for packing supplies used by the civil agencies.

Industry, at the time, was also moving toward marketing plans that products would be consumed

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object
grigory [225]

Answer:

The "injuries and usurpations" described in this quote are the colonists' <u><em>proof that the king violated the principles of limited government, social contract, and natural rights</em></u>.

Explanation:

The American Declaration of Independence was the first formally documented declaration of the colonists asserting their right to govern themselves. The document reveals the nation's desire and decision to make their own government rather than be a colony of Britain.

In the given quote from the Declaration, the colonists made a bold declaration that the king of Britain has a <em>"history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."</em> The use of the phrase <em>"repeated injuries and usurpations" </em>refers to the English king's violations of the government, social contract, and natural rights.

Thus, the correct answer is the first option.

6 0
3 years ago
Apakah peristiwa yang membawa kepada pengisytiharaan darurat oleg sir edward gent?​
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

cant understand if theres a question

6 0
3 years ago
Andrew Jackson won the presidential election with 56% of the popular vote and 68% of the Electoral College votes. His big margin
Harrizon [31]
How about man of the people? 
Jackson was a democrat and believed that everyone should have an opportunity in the economy and opposed aristocrats. Jackson won the southern and western parts of the nation in the election as a result.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Nikita, dictator of USSR publicly call Stallin?
    12·1 answer
  • 3. According to Fabri, what were Germany's strengths when it was "at the peak of the states in europe
    13·1 answer
  • What group wanted to severely punish the South for causing the Civil war?
    9·2 answers
  • Summarize the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, will mark brainliest :D
    8·1 answer
  • According ancient greek, who invented musical instruments
    8·1 answer
  • How did freedom and slavery developed together in colonial American?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the women's rights movement decline over the course of 1920
    10·1 answer
  • New factories that popped up all over Great Britain were often powered by water and steam power true or false
    13·1 answer
  • What are some amendments that have become part of the Constitution since 1791?
    14·1 answer
  • Powhatan, leader of the Powhatan Algonquians in Virginia, expanded his power over other groups of Indians by
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!