This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
Answer:
Groups use varied methods to try to achieve their aims including lobbying, media campaigns, publicity stunts, polls, research, and policy briefings.
The answer should be July 4, 1776
Answer:
the third circle nanwnnwnw
A person who feels very good after receiving a compliment, but very bad after being insulted, would sore high on measures of
<u> "self-esteem variability".</u>
The connection of self-esteem variability to identity, state of mind, and conduct was explored. Self-esteem variability was estimated by figuring the standard deviation of self-appraisals made amid seven days of experience-examining. Members high in self-esteem variability were reluctant, socially on edge, and avoidant of social settings. Confidence fluctuation was mostly free of the theoretically comparative attribute of affect-intensity.
