Answer:
Yes, it was. The US was, like the rest of the world, soldiering on towards the end of a dark period of human history that had seen the single most costly conflict (in terms of life) in history, and they chose to adopt a stance that seemed to limit the amount of casualties in the war, by significantly shortening it with the use of atomic weapons.
It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.
Explanation:
Compared to the national rate, abused children are 4 times more likely to abuse their own children.
Research on the role of family influences on aggression indicates that parents' aggression can influence children's social problem-solving. Abused children are more likely to resort to abusive behavior in adulthood than children who did not experience abuse.
It's true, over thousands of years the Bantu immigration contribuited to the rich diversity of the cultures in Africa.
The concept of the Christian Imago Dei was developed by Shelly & Miller (2006) as a person created in the image of God who gives dignity and honor to all while separating humanity from everything else on earth. explained. This is important for healthcare because people's lives depend on it.
Summary. References to Adult Dei represent the fundamental relationship between God and humans, properly assessing basic human goodness and prosperity, and influencing sound medical decisions.
Theologian Nicholas Wolterstorff argues that the idea of human rights stems from a Christian reflection on the core belief that God created humans in his own image or "imago Dei." This is the central principle of Christianity, which states that all human beings are worthy and dignified in the image of God.
Learn more about imago Dei at
brainly.com/question/16606090
#SPJ4
<u>Ethics and morals</u> refer to our beliefs about what is right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, virtuous vs. corrupt. Read more about ethics and morals.
<h3>What are considered as standard ethics and morals?</h3>
Ethics and morals conform to “right” and “wrong” conduct. While they can be used interchangeably, they are as well different.
<h3>What are the differences in ethics and morals?</h3>
Ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Moral, on the other hand, refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about ethics and morals: brainly.com/question/1326871
#SPJ12
