To me, the major influence of the People's Party (the Populists) is that it did a great deal to lead to the rise of the Progressives in the early 1900s. As an often-quoted line goes, populismshaved its whiskers, washed its shirt, put on a derby, and moved up into the middle classWhen it did this, it became Progressivism. The Progressive agenda was really based on the Populists' agenda, only with much less of an emphasis on farmers and rural people.In the longer term, you could argue that the Populists' ideas have been very enduring. They have (you could argue) led to modern day politicians like Sarah Palin who believe in the idea of "common" or "regular" or "real" Americans fighting a battle against the elites.
This post worked to instill fear into those who breached rationing orders. It publicly shames those who are of rationing and details the criminal convictions obtained against such individuals.
You need to write a paper about ways that the revolutionary war could or could not be considered a civil war. It's also asking you to cite two sources on your document from other essays that would support your point of view.
Answer:
The 10% Plan
Explanation:
Lincoln’s blueprint for Reconstruction included the Ten-Percent Plan,which specified that a southern state could be readmitted into the Union once 10 percent of its voters (from the voter rolls for the election of 1860) swore an Oath Of Allegiance to the Union. Voters could then elect delegates to draft revised state constitutions and establish new state governments. All southerners except for high-ranking Confederate army officers and government officials would be granted a full pardon. Lincoln guaranteed southerners that he would protect their private property, though not their slaves. Most moderate Republicans in Congress supported the president’s proposal for Reconstruction because they wanted to bring a quick end to the war.
<span>The British presence in India began as a commercial enterprise: the British East India Company, a trading organization, had been active on the subcontinent since the early 1600s and, by the middle of the 1700s, had turned India into what historian Philip J. Stern calls “the company state.” However, the 19th century witnessed the peak of Britain’s colonial era, when India was considered the crown jewel of a huge empire on which, as a contemporary phrase put it, "the sun never set."</span>
