Information:
An ideal Supreme Court may come accross as scary but, if we think about it it's like any other building. Ususally, it has many pillars suppoting it and is usually decorated in coulourless way.
Extra Information:
Here are some pictures for you to look at if you are stilll finding it difficult to imagine what a supreme court may look like
Answer:
The collaboration is similar, but the legal context differs.
Explanation:
This assertion is accurate. Police composite sketches are made more so that suspects or victims will be recognized by friends, family, and acquaintances than in the anticipation that a passerby will recognize someone from a sketch as they pass by.
<h3>The purpose of police composite sketches</h3>
Police primarily use facial composites in their (often serious) criminal investigations. In an effort to identify the suspect, the suspect's face is recreated using these photographs. In archeological investigations, facial reconstruction can be utilized to visualize ancient mummies or human remains.
<h3>Accuracy of composite sketches</h3>
Hard numbers are hard to find, however some study indicates that less than 20% of the time, composite photos or facial sketches of suspects are helpful. According to other studies, the number may potentially be as low as 8%.
<h3>How are police sketches created?</h3>
In order to construct a composite sketch, a forensic artist typically speaks with witnesses and victims at the crime scene. This artist may also work as a patrol officer or a private contractor. The composite could be entirely drawn by hand or digitally.
Learn more about forensic artist: brainly.com/question/22025785
#SPJ4
Answer:
in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.
Explanation:
Answer:
You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?
b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?
