<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
Stock A will be preferable for the risk averse Investors.
Explanation:
The reason is that risk is the measure of the vulnerability of the returns on the investment made which means if the return on the investment has greater vulnerability of returns then it is highly risky. So the risk averse investor would prefer stock A with lower risk.
(Special comments:
It must be noted that the higher return shows that the investment is also highly risky because nobody is going to give you more with low risk associated investments. This means lower return on Stock B is also preferable here for the risk averse investor because it carries lower risks.)
Answer:
Trading
Explanation:
Buying and selling stocks is another term for trading because it is a system of "give and get"
Answer:
Cost of each bottle of water is $7.
Explanation:
This is the case for economies of scale. When Charles produce 1 bottle of water, it costs him $1 per bottle, when 8 bottles are produced it costs him $7. The cost per bottle of water reduces as units increases.
Answer:
In this case, Jack's "human/interpersonal skills" failed. The skills that Jack is failing to use are important for "managers."
Explanation:
From the statement above, we can assume that Jack's position is superior to that of Samantha. He is, probably, the manager. However, he yelled at Samantha last week because she was late. In this case, Jack failed in his "human skills." This is also known as<em> "interpersonal skills,"</em> which is <u>a set of skills related to interacting effectively with other people.</u>
A manager with good interpersonal skills knows how to listen to his subordinates. In fact, he should be an <em>active listener,</em> which means he should be observant upon listening to other people's explanation. He should also provide advice or solve problems without yelling.
Thus, this explain the answers.