Answer:
A. " . . . they [the children] made fun of him because he would not play games or fly kites, or because he mispronounced some word. . ."
Explanation:
'Tiger-Tiger' is a part of the collective stories in 'The Jungle Book' written by Rudyard Kipling. In this story, Mowgli leaves the jungle and decides to go live in human society, after driving the Sher Khan out of the jungle. When Mowgli comes to a village, he gets adopted by a wealthy family, who lost their son.
The theme that the rules of society don't benefit the needs of the individual is developed in option A. Mowgli is a jungle boy, brought up by a wolf pack in jungle, now he lives among human, his own kind, but, in both cases Mowgli remained an outcast. In jungle he was weak among the animals and the beast, but among humans he proved to be as strong as a bull.
In the statement, in option A, the narrator describes how the rules of society didn't fit Mowgli. When he was in jungle he learned to control his temperament. But when children made fun of him, he wanted to break them in two pieces.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Hello. You forgot to say that this question is about "The Great Gatsby".
Answer and Explanation:
Although "The Great Gatsby" has some romantic elements, I believe that the story goes far beyond that, not allowing me to see it as a romantic and sentimental story. On the contrary, I believe that "The great Gastsby" presents the domination of money, the American dream and the imbalance between the social classes that the country presents. The book shows how all these factors, acting together, interfere in the lives of citizens, in all possible elements, even in love.
Answer:
3 and 5
Explanation:
the words monstrous and staring both describe death as a physical thing that can in fact, be monstrous and have the ability to stare, and not just an idea that happens to all of us.
sturdy and handsome are both adjectives meant for humans, in which the said beasts are not
Answer:
I would say the correct answer is D . Without her husband, a woman would lead a life of total misery.
Explanation:
In this passage, Jennings says that <u>both nature and "mankind" have made the man superior to his wife</u>. Some of his rights are "natural", others "acquired", but he has them all and his wife (obviously) none. It follows that a woman is utterly devastated if she chooses not to adapt and even submit to her husband.
This is not a general statement about avoidance of conflict. Nor is it about the man's social connections and influence - Jennings clearly thinks that man's power doesn't stem from social circumstances alone, but from nature too. It's not about women's education (or lack thereof) either. That part is not even mentioned.
Would you rather give your money to change or know it's safe?
