1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
3 years ago
11

the author of The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone makes his views clear to the reader by using the second person point of view. by d

escribing his own experiences. by avoiding the use of counterclaims. by using a mix of fact and opinion.
English
2 answers:
kondaur [170]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<h2><u><em>B. BY DESCRIBING HIS OWN EXPERIENCES. </em></u></h2>

Explanation:

vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
6 0

The author of The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone makes his views clear to the reader by describing his own experiences.

James Giblin has made it an important task to have the readers see his views clearly by describing his own experiences. Doing so made the readers feel like they were present in those experiences and it made the readers see the author’s view clearly as a result.

You might be interested in
Read the sample student paragraph that addresses a counterclaim and rebuttal on increasing the legal age of driving to eighteen.
yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

D. It provides strong reasons to weaken the counterclaim.

Have a nice day, y'all :)

4 0
3 years ago
23. Some groups feel as though all farmers should have to pay to repair damage from nonpoint pollution from sediment and chemica
Neko [114]

Answer:

Hi myself Shrushtee.

Explanation:

Almost everything humans do, from growing food to manufacturing products to generating electricity, has the potential to release pollution into the environment. Regulatory agencies charged with protecting the environment identify two main categories of pollution: point-source and nonpoint-source pollution.

Point-source pollution is easy to identify. As the name suggests, it comes from a single place. Nonpoint-source pollution is harder to identify and harder to address. It is pollution that comes from many places, all at once.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines point source pollution as any contaminant that enters the environment from an easily identified and confined place. Examples include smokestacks, discharge pipes, and drainage ditches.

Factories and power plants can be a source of point-source pollution, affecting both air and water. Smokestacks may spew carbon monoxide, heavy metal, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, or “particulate matter” (small particles) into the air. Oil refineries, paper mills, and auto plants that use water as part of their manufacturing processes can discharge effluent—wastewater containing harmful chemical pollutants—into rivers, lakes, or the ocean.

Municipal wastewater treatment plants are another common source of point-source pollution. Effluent from a treatment plant can introduce nutrients and harmful microbes into waterways. Nutrients can cause a rampant growth of algae in water.

Nonpoint-source pollution is the opposite of point-source pollution, with pollutants released in a wide area. As an example, picture a city street during a thunderstorm. As rainwater flows over asphalt, it washes away drops of oil that leaked from car engines, particles of tire rubber, dog waste, and trash. The runoff goes into a storm sewer and ends up in a nearby river. Runoff is a major cause of nonpoint-source pollution. It is a big problem in cities because of all the hard surfaces, including streets and roofs. The amount of pollutants washed from a single city block might be small, but when you add up the miles and miles of pavement in a big city you get a big problem.

In rural areas, runoff can wash sediment from the roads in a logged-over forest tract. It can also carry acid from abandoned mines and flush pesticides and fertilizer from farm fields. All of this pollution is likely to wind up in streams, rivers, and lakes.

Airborne pollutants are major contributors to acid rain. It forms in the atmosphere when sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides combine with water. Because acid rain results from the long-range movement of those pollutants from many factories and power plants, it is considered nonpoint-source pollution.

In the United States, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act have helped to limit both point-source and nonpoint-source pollution. Thanks to these two legislative initiatives, in effect for some 50 years now, America’s air and water are cleaner today than they were for most of the 20th century.

<em><u>P</u></em><em><u>lease</u></em><em><u> mark</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u> as</u></em>

8 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP, IF YOU ANSWER JUST FOR POINTS I WILL REPORT YOU! Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

1.

Hyperbole; Hyperbole is like an extreme exaggeration for effect. A shot could not truly be heard around the world. This phrase is used to emphasize the significance of that first shot.

2.

Hyperbole again; The sound of the birds could not literally be heard for miles, nor would it actually "put nations on the alert." The author uses these phrases to illustrate the fact that the birds were very very loud.

3.

First phrase contains a simile to show the power of nature. (C)

Second phrase gives human abilities such as singing and language to nature. (E)

Third phrase contains a metaphor that shows how we are all connected. (A)

Fourth phrase contains a hyperbole that creates a vivid image. (D)

Fifth phrase contains alliteration, which creates rhythm. (B)

4.

Like a starving beast, the fire consumed the forest.

5.

Simile (uses the word "like")

6.

I shows how people, animals, and the earth are all connected.

7.

Fountain ( ... fountains of song...)

8.

Simile = C

Metaphor = A

Personification = D

Hyperbole = B

Alliteration = E

9.

It communicates appreciation and love of nature.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
I am working on conjunctions Louisa does not eat wheat. She does not eat peanuts.
Olenka [21]

im sorry but what kind of conjunction are u saying...is it subordinating or coordinating?

4 0
3 years ago
Which provides the PRIMARY function of the underlined adverbial clause? If Cassie's team had won the tournament, Coach Goodale w
ra1l [238]
<span> If Cassie's team had won the tournament, Coach Goodale would have been thrilled. 

The adverbial clause is: IF CASSIE'S TEAM HAD WON THE TOURNAMENT.

The primary function of the underlined adverbial clause is C) ADVERBIAL CLAUSE OF CONDITION.

The adverbial clause of condition usually starts with the words IF or UNLESS. This states the condition for the main idea to come into effect. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 12. How did many Southern states work around the voting rights guaranteed in the Fifteenth
    13·1 answer
  • What does the setting do to the story?
    7·1 answer
  • Which pattern of organization is used ? Chavez died in 1993. He was 66 years old.​ 25,000 people honored his legacy by marching
    7·1 answer
  • The narrator most clearly indicates that John Bergson regards his sons as
    6·1 answer
  • Where is a thesis found
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone help me I need it
    12·1 answer
  • How do Montag and Clarissa feel about finding each other? Help please
    6·1 answer
  • The four domains that make up language learning are...
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me with this<br> NO LINKS or i will report
    11·1 answer
  • What Edna is asked if she loves Robert, how does she respond and what reason does she give for doing so?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!